Get help from the best in academic writing.

Article review-Cognitive neurology course

Paper details For this assignment, select a peer-reviewed journal article relating to an area of problem solving, decision making, or an intelligence theory that was discussed in class (e.g., fluid or crystalline intelligence, primary/secondary reinforcers, biases, or effective problem-solving strategies).
The article must meet the following criteria:
The article must be from a peer-reviewed journal.
The article must be obtained from the GCU Library.
The article must be a research study, rather than a literature review (i.e., the article has to have methods, results, and discussion sections).
The article must utilize a cognitive or behavioral theory, model, or effect.
The purpose of this article review is to get you to think critically about an area of cognition or learning. After reading your chosen article, address the following questions. Use subheadings to differentiate between the various aspects of your review.
Major Findings/Conclusions:
Be sure to include the major findings of the study.
What conclusions did the researchers draw from the data?
Implications for the Field of Psychology (how the findings could be used/applied in the field):
Include how the results of the study can be applied (e.g., why are the findings of the study important?). These may be the implications the authors put forth, or your own ideas (be sure to cite if they are not your ideas).
How would psychology/education/counseling professionals benefit (learn) from the findings?
How might the results improve knowledge or application in the field? What should psychology professionals “take away” from the findings?
Method/Participants:
Describe the basics of how the study was conducted. What procedures were used?
Who were the participants?
Strengths/Limitations of the Study:
Include at least one strength AND one limitation you saw in the study.
Explain why you believe each is a strength or limitation. Hint: study findings are not “strengths” in and of themselves.
The article review should be 1,000-1,250 words. Include a minimum of three scholarly articles.

Addiction Thoughts

Paper details This is just a summary of the article that was provided by my professor. The article discusses whether addiction is a disease or a choice. You can include your opinion in there as well if you’d like! I created an intro but I got stuck. I will provide my intro as well as the article and you can continue from there or just completely write your own thing. Good Luck!!

Writer’s Choice

Paper details https://archive.org/details/isbn_9781879237537?view=theater

For this assignment, you will be working out of pages 37-108 in Your Family, Your Self. The goal of this assignment is to enhance your understanding of the various roles, scripts, and rules that operated in your family system when you were growing up. All your answers are confidential, and will not be shared. I will grade this assignment based on completion and effort, and not “right answers.”

Instructions (5 Steps total):

Step One
In a Word doc, create a heading called, Family Roles. Under this heading, list all the names of the people who were central to your family system growing up. This list will likely include your parents, step-parents, and siblings. It may also include grandparents, Aunts, Uncles, Cousins, and step-brothers/sisters. Decide on which names to list based upon how relevant they were to your upbringing, and their level of participation in the family system. For this exercise, it’s best if you list only those names who were intimately participated in the system (on a day-today basis, or close to it). Not listing a name does not mean that person was irrelevant or unimportant!

Step Two
After carefully reading the chapter, “Family Roles,” try to identify which role was assigned to each person on your list (especially yourself). The various roles to choose from are as follows: caretaker, hero, scapegoat, mascot, and lost child. If you’re having a hard time deciding which role a particular member was assigned, do not worry. It may be that roles in your home were flexible, rather than rigid, and perhaps people moved “in and out” of their assigned role at various stages. Assign what you think is the most applicable one given the choices, even if it’s an imperfect fit.

Then, ask yourself, “does this person continue on in this role?” If so, put a YES next to the role name. Next, tell me whether that person’s role was flexible or rigid? Finally, tell me which person on your list: a) usually restored the family system to relative homeostasis after anxiety was encountered; b) usually caused the anxiety in the family system (or was perceived to be the person who typically caused the anxiety, which may indeed be a bit of a different question); c) how was the anxiety in the family system passed around (i.e., circulated)– did it tend to “travel” from one person, to another, and then perhaps to the member in charge of restoring homeostasis?

Step 3
Now that we’ve looked at family roles, let’s turn to individual scripts. On page 79, determine which of the following scripts (sometimes called life positions) best applies to you: I’m not OK, you’re not OK; I’m not OK, you’re OK; I’m OK, you’re not OK; or I’m OK, you’re OK. Once you identify which script best fits your experience, explain why (120-200 words). Does the script continue on in this form, more or less?

Step 4
As we seek to identify more about your script, please answer any three of the following questions (see pages 81-86 for more details):

Who were/are your heroes and villains?
What events keep recurring in your life?
What were your favorite stories and who were your favorite characters in childhood?
Describe your shadow side (or some part of it)?
How does your body figure into the script?
What behavior patterns do you tend to repeat over and over?
How is spirituality woven into your script?
How does your script define your gender?

Step Five
As the final part of this assignment, cast a glance back to your childhood once again, and answer the following questions about the rules of your home.

Were the rules in your family system: covert or overt (mainly)? Appropriate or inappropriate (and by this I mean in relation to developmental stages, and whether the rules were appropriate to your developmental stage)? Flexible or rigid (mainly)? Healthy or toxic?

Once you’ve completed all five steps, describe three insights you’ve gleaned from this assignment, and then upload it here.

Cite as needed.

Article review-Cognitive neurology course

Paper details For this assignment, select a peer-reviewed journal article relating to an area of problem solving, decision making, or an intelligence theory that was discussed in class (e.g., fluid or crystalline intelligence, primary/secondary reinforcers, biases, or effective problem-solving strategies).
The article must meet the following criteria:
The article must be from a peer-reviewed journal.
The article must be obtained from the GCU Library.
The article must be a research study, rather than a literature review (i.e., the article has to have methods, results, and discussion sections).
The article must utilize a cognitive or behavioral theory, model, or effect.
The purpose of this article review is to get you to think critically about an area of cognition or learning. After reading your chosen article, address the following questions. Use subheadings to differentiate between the various aspects of your review.
Major Findings/Conclusions:
Be sure to include the major findings of the study.
What conclusions did the researchers draw from the data?
Implications for the Field of Psychology (how the findings could be used/applied in the field):
Include how the results of the study can be applied (e.g., why are the findings of the study important?). These may be the implications the authors put forth, or your own ideas (be sure to cite if they are not your ideas).
How would psychology/education/counseling professionals benefit (learn) from the findings?
How might the results improve knowledge or application in the field? What should psychology professionals “take away” from the findings?
Method/Participants:
Describe the basics of how the study was conducted. What procedures were used?
Who were the participants?
Strengths/Limitations of the Study:
Include at least one strength AND one limitation you saw in the study.
Explain why you believe each is a strength or limitation. Hint: study findings are not “strengths” in and of themselves.
The article review should be 1,000-1,250 words. Include a minimum of three scholarly articles.

Essay Writing at Proficient Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: