Get help from the best in academic writing.

in the Workplace Discussion Instructions Now that we have reached the end of this course, you will discuss the key take-aways from the course that you can use to impact your current and future nursing practice. In your post, you will need to address the following topics: What are the two biggest topics that you learned about in this course that you think will have the greatest impact on your nursing practice? What are two barriers you will likely face in your workplace that may hinder your application of EBP concepts? How can you potentially overcome those barriers in your workplace? Within your current work context, how can you become more involved in promoting and using EBP within your department and beyond to ultimately improve patient outcomes?

Respond to one peer about additional potential barriers they may face in their workplaces, and/or possible creative strategies for becoming more involved in EBP and overcoming barriers to implementation within the nursing practice setting. The original posting should be at least 350 words for the post and references. At least one peer-reviewed reference is required for this post, which may include your course textbook. Respond to one peer by offering new perspectives and encouraging further discussion and critical thinking. Peer responses should be at least 150-200 words.

Submit a document showing: Your literature review topic and how it fits into your overall group topic and research

Submit a document showing:

Your literature review topic and how it fits into your overall group topic and research question
Your search terms used
Databases searched
Annotated Bibliography of at least 2 sources that you will incorporate into updated lit review
You must attach copies of the articles. Submit articles on paper by the due date.

NOTE: topic is transitional care and hospital readmission – basically, why are people ending up back in skilled nursing facilities after being discharged? Using any recent articles
APA format

Organizational change is inevitable in the healthcare industry, and with it often comes employee resistance. Read this case study

Organizational change is inevitable in the healthcare industry, and with it often comes employee resistance. Read this case study – Schweiger, S., Stouten, H.,

of the qualitative studies published within the past five years from your Literature Review Synthesis Table (from Module 5) that directly addresses your PIO/PICO question. Try to avoid selecting a metasynthesis, systematic review, literature review, or mixed methods study for this assignment.Using that study, perform a systematic critical appraisal of its qualitative research. Answer the following questions:

Was there a clearly identifiable and articulated: Purpose? Research question? Justification for using the qualitative design/method? Phenomenon that is the focus of the research? Were study sample participants representative based on the research purpose and sampling criteria? Were participant characteristics described? Was sampling adequate, as evidenced by achieving saturation of data? Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the people who collected data appropriately trained? Data analysis: Was a verification process used in every step by checking and confirming with participants the trustworthiness of analysis and interpretation? Was there a description of how data were analyzed (i.e., method), by computer or manually? Are findings supported by the narrative data (participant quotes)? Are conclusions clearly explained? Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy? That is, do you have confidence in the truth value of the results? Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline? What quality rating would you assign this study based on the table below? Provide a rationale for your choice and state whether you would feel comfortable using this particular study as part of an evidence-based policy change decision in your workplace. Quality Rating for Qualitative Studies High/Good Quality The report discusses efforts to enhance or evaluate the quality of the data and the overall inquiry in sufficient detail, and it describes the specific techniques used to enhance the quality of the inquiry. Evidence of some or all of the following is found in the report: Transparency: Describes how information was documented to justify decisions, how data were reviewed by others, and how themes and categories were formulated. Diligence: Reads and rereads data to check interpretations; seeks opportunity to find multiple sources to corroborate evidence. Verification: The process of checking, confirming, and ensuring methodologic coherence. Self-reflection and self-scrutiny: Being continuously aware of how a researcher’s experiences, background, or prejudices might shape and bias analysis and interpretations. Participant-driven inquiry: Participants shape the scope and breadth of questions; analysis and interpretation give voice to those who participated. Insightful interpretation: Data and knowledge are linked in meaningful ways to relevant literature. Low Quality The study contributes little to the overall review of findings and has few, if any, of the features listed for High/Good quality. This critique will be written as a formal APA paper with appropriate headings to separate major concepts within the paper. The paper should address the questions listed above, but students should not write in a question/answer format. In other words, do not include the questions in your paper. Instead, use the paper to narratively answer the questions above and provide a comprehensive critique of your chosen study. The paper will be around 1000 words in length, not including the title and reference pages.

Essay Writing at Proficient Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service