Get help from the best in academic writing.

PLEASE ANSWER EACH QUESTION SEPARATELY. 1)you discovered how historians evaluate sources before drawing conclusions about the past, and you

PLEASE ANSWER EACH QUESTION SEPARATELY.
1)you discovered how historians evaluate sources before drawing conclusions about the past, and you reviewed sources for your assignment. How does the ability to determine the validity and credibility of a source (a key element of problem solving) help you in your everyday life? How might your ability to determine the validity and credibility of a source help you solve a problem in the workplace?
2)Describe one pro and one con for using a graph or chart. Then, share an example of a time when a data visualization (like a graph or chart) changed your mind about something or gave you a deeper understanding of a topic or current event.

Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)

00)
Tammy has an old generator in her garage and she decides to sell it.
Tammy is aware that it has some problems. Steve comes by and looks at the
generator and asks Tammy if it is in good working order. She answers that
“This is the best generator I’ve ever seen.” Steve buys the generator
and it breaks after a week. Steve wants to sue Tammy for fraudulent
misrepresentation, will he win? Why or why not?
CHAPTER 6 – Overview and Formation of Contracts 

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)

00)
CHAPTER 6 – Overview and Formation of Contracts 
Tammy has an old generator in her garage and she decides to sell it. Tammy is aware that it has some problems. Steve comes by and looks at the generator and asks Tammy if it is in good working order. She answers that “This is the best generator I’ve ever seen.” Steve buys the generator and it breaks after a week. Steve wants to sue Tammy for fraudulent misrepresentation, will he win? Why or why not?
2ND ASSIGNMENT –> DUE THURSDAY 10/24 ( Pledge $4.00)CHAPTER 7 – Contract Performance_Conditions, Breach

need within 6-7 hour

youtube.com/watch?v=EcKxaq1FTac
1.  What did you find most interesting about the NOVA program shown in class? Submit at least 500 words. 
2. You must read and respond to at least ONE student’s posting with three sentences or more.  You may comment or expand another student’s comments.
I found several things to be interesting while watching the Nova program.  The first thing I found interesting was how long it took to find out who the hacker was.  I did not think that it would be that difficult to track the hacker even though this happened many years ago.
Another thing I found interesting was how easy it was for the hacker to break into the system.  He simply found a hole in the lab systems which gave him access to them.  I was surprised that he did it so easily and that no one else did it since it was so easy.  I am also surprised that the hacker did not try to steal more money then 0.75 cents.  Most people, if they obtained access to something like that, would steal as much money as possible.  However, this hacker was actually smart because he probably did not think he would get caught or that the company would even care about 0.75 cents.
The next thing I found interesting is that there was not a more secure system.  Considering that the hacker got into government and military systems, you would think that there would have been premium security.  Also, you would assume that the government or military would have a way of knowing as soon as someone breaks into their system.  Because there was and still is so much vital and confidential information on those systems, it would be reasonable for one to make the assumption that top of the line security would have been implemented.  Even when Cliff told the agencies about the hacker, they simply ignored him and acted as though it was no big deal.  It makes me wonder if the agencies were just very naiive that someone would even try to break into their systems or did they just not trust Cliff.  The agencies may have also been less informed about hacking back in the day because there are not many logical reasons as to why Cliff would be ignored when he was only trying to help them out.
I also thought it was very interesting how Cliff tried to figure out who the hacker was. I did not expect Cliff to have a pager that buzzed him every time the hacker went to log on. I also did not expect Cliff to do all of the complicated things he did to try and figure out who the hacker was. For example, I was especially surprised when he assigned a printer to each phone line in order to see who was getting into the system. Cliff amuzed me throughout with his outside of the box thinking and his overall passion towards the whole situation. He even went so far as to lose sleep when the hacker logged on in the middle of the night. Cliff’s dedication to the situation ended up paying off because they figured out who the hackers were.
The Nova program was very informative and it was actually interesting to see intricate ways to catch a hacker. in the second part read this person post  and respond it with 3 sentences or more. 

See instructions Class is Philosophy 103 Pick from one suggested topic from instructor- See Paper Details

Phil 103 Paper Assignment

Assignment: Write a 3-4 page paper on one and only one of the following topics:

Topic 1: Moral relativism. (i) State and explain moral relativism in both forms: cultural relativism and individual relativism (aka subjectivism). Then (ii) explain some reasons or evidence in support of moral relativism discussed in the assigned readings. Next, (iii) discuss at least one key criticism of each form of moral relativism discussed in the assigned readings. Finally, (iv) provide a thoughtful evaluation of this debate, where this involves explaining the reason (not your belief) why you do or don’t think moral relativism survives the criticism(s) you raised against it.

Topic 2: Divine command theory. (i) State and explain divine command theory discussed in the assigned readings. Then (ii) explain some reasons or evidence offered in support of divine command theory discussed in the assigned readings. Next, (iii) discuss at least one key criticism of divine command theory discussed in the assigned readings. Finally, (iv) provide a thoughtful evaluation of this debate, where this involves explaining the reason (not your belief) why you do or don’t think divine command theory survives the criticism(s) you raised against it.

Topic 3: Natural law theory. (i) State and explain natural law theory. Then (ii) explain some reasons or evidence offered in support of natural law theory discussed in the assigned readings. Next, (iii) discuss at least one key criticism of natural law theory discussed in the assigned readings. Finally, (iv) provide a thoughtful evaluation of this debate, where this involves explaining the reason (not your belief) why you do or don’t think natural law theory survives the criticism(s) you raised against it.

Topic 4: Utilitarianism. (i) State and explain utilitarianism. Then (ii) explain some reasons or evidence offered in support of utilitarianism discussed in the assigned readings. Next, (iii) discuss at least one key criticism of utilitarianism from the readings. Finally, (iv) provide a thoughtful evaluation of this debate, where this involves explaining the reason (not your belief) why you do or don’t think utilitarianism survives the criticism(s) you raised against it.

Topic 4: Kantian Ethics. (i) State and explain Kantian ethics. Then (ii) explain some reasons or evidence offered in support of Kantian ethics discussed in the assigned readings. Next, (iii) discuss at least one key criticism of Kantian ethics from the assigned readings. Finally, (iv) provide a thoughtful evaluation of this debate, where this involves explaining the reason (not your belief) why you do or don’t think the theory survives the criticism(s) you raised against it.

Topic 5: Social Contract Theory: (i) State and explain social contract theory. Then (ii) explain some reasons or evidence offered in support of social contract theory discussed in the assigned readings. Next, (iii) discuss at least one key criticism of social contract theory from the assigned readings. Finally, (iv) provide a thoughtful evaluation of this debate, where this involves explaining the reason (not your belief) why you do or don’t think the theory survives the criticism(s) you raised against it.

Topic 6: Virtue Ethics: (i) State and explain virtue ethics. Then (ii) explain some reasons or evidence offered in support of virtue ethics discussed in the assigned readings. Next, (iii) discuss at least one key criticism of virtue ethics from the assigned readings. Finally, (iv) provide a thoughtful evaluation of this debate, where this involves explaining the reason (not your belief) why you do or don’t think the theory survives the criticism(s) you raised against it.

Topic 7: Feminist Ethics: (i) State and explain feminist ethics. Then (ii) explain some reasons or evidence offered in support of feminist ethics discussed in the assigned readings. Next, (iii) discuss at least one key criticism of feminist ethics from the assigned readings. Finally, (iv) provide a thoughtful evaluation of this debate, where this involves explaining the reason (not your belief) why you do or don’t think the theory survives the criticism(s) you raised against it.

-Due date: See syllabus

-3-4 pages, double-spaced, New Times Roman font, or something similar (no large or unusual fonts), 12 pt. font, black ink, standard margins

-Sources: Just use the chapters from our textbooks, as well as the related assigned online readings. No outside sources.

Suggestive outline:

I. Introduction: a short, 4-6 sentence introduction that consists solely in (a) a topic sentence (e.g., “This paper explores moral relativism”), and (b) a roadmap of the major sections of your paper (e.g., “The plan of the paper is as follows. First, I will… Second, I will… Third, I will…. Finally, I will…”).

II. Explanation of the Theory of Your Chosen Topic (moral relativism, divine command theory, or natural law theory)

III. Some Reasons in Support of the Theory

III. Criticism(s) of the Theory

IV. Evaluating the Debate

A. What, precisely, is right or wrong with the criticism(s) of the theory you discussed?

B. Your final “two cents” about the theory

V. Conclusion

Grades will be assigned in the following manner:

40% Conventions (organization, grammar, syntax, spelling, etc)
30% Clarity and accuracy in explaining and describing the ethical theory.
30% Clarity and effectiveness in critically evaluating the theory

Sources: You should use the articles in our assigned readings (our textbook and online readings) as your only primary sources. No outside sources – especially not Internet sources (e.g., Wikipedia, dictionaries, online papers, web pages, blogs, etc.). It will hurt your grade if you use them.

Cite your sources, and include a Works Cited page. Use standard citation methods (either MLA or APA citation format is fine). No paper that fails to cite their sources, and to cite them properly, is eligible for a grade of B or higher.

I’d prefer it if you didn’t cite the PowerPoint slides or class notes at all, as they are merely supplementarymaterials whose aim is to help you comprehend the readings. But no paper that quotes only (or mainly) the PowerPoint slides from class is eligible for a grade above “C”. A key aim of the exercise is to grapple with the readings themselves, so as to develop your skills of critically reading a piece of philosophical text, comprehending it, and critically evaluating it.

It should also go without saying that plagiarism will not be tolerated. If caught, you’ll receive an automatic ‘F’ for the course, as well as standard university discipline, up to and perhaps including expulsion from the university.

The grading scale on the syllabus will apply. An A-range paper will have all the required sections — explanation of the theory, lines of support for the theory, criticisms of the theory, and evaluation of the theory–and will be well-written and well-organized. It will also show a solid understanding of the ideas, arguments, and criticisms discussed. Finally, it will properly and adequately cite the relevant sources. B-range papers and lower will miss one or more of these criteria. Examples: the paper contains numerous spelling errors; the paper is not well-organized; the paper inaccurately or inadequately explains a key component of the theory, line of evidence in its support, or key criticism of the theory; the paper doesn’t provide an adequate explanation of why the theory does or does not survive the strongest criticisms raised against it in the evaluation section; the paper leaves out proper citations; etc.

Essay Writing at Proficient Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: