Get help from the best in academic writing.

TED TALK

Paper details Choose a TED Talk in which the speaker presents a persuasive thesis on a debatable issue. Your purpose in this assignment is to analyze and evaluate the speaker’s argument, not to simply summarize or to argue for your own position on the speaker’s topic. Your overall judgement of the argument will be stated in your thesis, which will be supported by your analytical explanation of the evidence you gather while answering the questions outlined below.

Here are some suggested TED Talks.

Yvonne Aki-Sawyer: How to turn your dissatisfaction into action (Links to an external site.)
Julia Dhar: How to disagree productively and find common ground (Links to an external site.)
Seth Godin: How to get your ideas to spread (Links to an external site.)
Nick Hanauer: The dirty secret of capitalism – and a new way forward (Links to an external site.)
Camille Langston: How to use rhetoric to get what you want (Links to an external site.)
Wanjira Mathai: 3 ways to uproot a culture of corruption (Links to an external site.)
Sendhil Mullainathan: Solving social problems with a nudge (Links to an external site.)
Structure your essay with a section heading (centered, bold, title case) for each of the three body sections and conclusion. In each section, write one or more paragraphs responding to the questions outlined below.

Set up your essay in APA format with title and reference pages. Use the template provided in Files. Cite the talk on a reference page in the following format.

Speakerlastname, Initial. Initial. (Year, Month day). Title of talk. URL

In a two- to three-page essay (600–900 words), address the following questions.

Introduction (No heading needed for introductions)
What is your purpose for writing?
How will your analysis essay be organized? Indicate the analysis sections in a sentence.
What is the TED speaker’s topic?
What is the speaker’s connection to the topic, and from what angle does the speaker approach the topic?
What is the speaker’s overall perspective or opinion on the argument? Whether it is clearly stated or not, identify what you think is your speaker’s central thesis.
What is your thesis regarding the quality of the speaker’s argument, including your overall judgment of this speaker’s effectiveness?
Rhetorical Situations (This is your most important and detailed section. Consider writing two to three paragraphs. Be sure to explain yourself.)
Who is the speaker’s target audience?
What is the speaker’s purpose? What does the speaker want the audience to do with the information they are presented with?
What is the context of the TED Talk? What historical or current event information is presented (or is missing) to help the audience understand the argument?
What rhetorical appeals (reason, emotion, credibility) does the speaker use to help strengthen the argument?
Evidence (Don’t just summarize the talk. Write at least one solid paragraph with detailed examples as well as explain how the evidence supports the speaker’s argument.)
What types of evidence does the speaker use?
Does the evidence seem credible, timely, and relevant? Why, or why not?
What additional information do you want to know about the topic?
Presentation (In a paragraph, consider both the argument’s structure and the speaker’s actual presentation skills.)
How does the speaker introduce the topic and engage the audience?
Does the speaker conclude the talk in an effective and memorable way?
Does the speaker use good presentation skills while delivering the message? Consider use of images or other visual aids, vocal qualities, use of humor, body language, connection with the audience, and so forth.
Conclusion
Wrap up your reflections on the TED speaker’s presentation.
What is your overall judgment of the argument’s quality and effectiveness based on your answers to the questions above?

Argumentative Essay

Paper details A. Instructions

Remember the word “argument” does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of the issue.

In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the touchstone.

Your submission must include an APA style reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need 2-4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.

On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.

B. Think About Your Writing

Below your reference page, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

1. What have you learned about how to present a strong argument? How could/will you apply this knowledge in your professional or everyday life (3-4 sentences)? Sophia says: Think about the specific skills and techniques that you used while developing and writing your essay. What tools will you take with you from this experience?

2. Consider the English Composition I course as a whole. What have you learned about yourself as a writer (5-6 sentences)? Sophia says: What did you learn that surprised you? Is there anything that you have struggled with in the past that you now feel more confident about?

C. Argumentative Essay Guidelines

Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your research essay until it meets these guidelines.

Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement

? Have you included a thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?

Argument Development

? Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
? Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?
? Is your essay 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or delete?

Research

? Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase?
? Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
? Have you referenced a range of 2-4 credible sources?
? Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?

Organization and Flow

? Is there an introduction, conclusion, adequate body paragraphs, and a counterargument?
? Is the argument presented in a logical order and easy for the reader to follow?
? Are there transitions within and between paragraphs?

Style

? Are the word choices accurate and effective?
? Are the sentence structures varied?

Conventions and Formatting

? Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?
? Have you double-checked for correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, and capitalization?
? Have you proofread for typos?

Before You Submit

? Have you answered all of the Think About Your Writing questions on a separate page below your reference page? Are your answers thoughtful and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
? Does your submission include your essay, followed by your reference page, followed by your Think About Your Writing questions?

E. Requirements

The essay should be 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words in length
Argumentative Essay Guidelines must be followed or submission will not be graded
Double-space the essay and use 1-inch margins
Use a readable 12-point font
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context
Composition must be original and written for this assignment
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited
Submission should include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition
Your submission must include the essay, reference page, and your answers to the refection questions
Submit a single file only, including all assignment components
Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.

TED TALK

Paper details Choose a TED Talk in which the speaker presents a persuasive thesis on a debatable issue. Your purpose in this assignment is to analyze and evaluate the speaker’s argument, not to simply summarize or to argue for your own position on the speaker’s topic. Your overall judgement of the argument will be stated in your thesis, which will be supported by your analytical explanation of the evidence you gather while answering the questions outlined below.

Here are some suggested TED Talks.

Yvonne Aki-Sawyer: How to turn your dissatisfaction into action (Links to an external site.)
Julia Dhar: How to disagree productively and find common ground (Links to an external site.)
Seth Godin: How to get your ideas to spread (Links to an external site.)
Nick Hanauer: The dirty secret of capitalism – and a new way forward (Links to an external site.)
Camille Langston: How to use rhetoric to get what you want (Links to an external site.)
Wanjira Mathai: 3 ways to uproot a culture of corruption (Links to an external site.)
Sendhil Mullainathan: Solving social problems with a nudge (Links to an external site.)
Structure your essay with a section heading (centered, bold, title case) for each of the three body sections and conclusion. In each section, write one or more paragraphs responding to the questions outlined below.

Set up your essay in APA format with title and reference pages. Use the template provided in Files. Cite the talk on a reference page in the following format.

Speakerlastname, Initial. Initial. (Year, Month day). Title of talk. URL

In a two- to three-page essay (600–900 words), address the following questions.

Introduction (No heading needed for introductions)
What is your purpose for writing?
How will your analysis essay be organized? Indicate the analysis sections in a sentence.
What is the TED speaker’s topic?
What is the speaker’s connection to the topic, and from what angle does the speaker approach the topic?
What is the speaker’s overall perspective or opinion on the argument? Whether it is clearly stated or not, identify what you think is your speaker’s central thesis.
What is your thesis regarding the quality of the speaker’s argument, including your overall judgment of this speaker’s effectiveness?
Rhetorical Situations (This is your most important and detailed section. Consider writing two to three paragraphs. Be sure to explain yourself.)
Who is the speaker’s target audience?
What is the speaker’s purpose? What does the speaker want the audience to do with the information they are presented with?
What is the context of the TED Talk? What historical or current event information is presented (or is missing) to help the audience understand the argument?
What rhetorical appeals (reason, emotion, credibility) does the speaker use to help strengthen the argument?
Evidence (Don’t just summarize the talk. Write at least one solid paragraph with detailed examples as well as explain how the evidence supports the speaker’s argument.)
What types of evidence does the speaker use?
Does the evidence seem credible, timely, and relevant? Why, or why not?
What additional information do you want to know about the topic?
Presentation (In a paragraph, consider both the argument’s structure and the speaker’s actual presentation skills.)
How does the speaker introduce the topic and engage the audience?
Does the speaker conclude the talk in an effective and memorable way?
Does the speaker use good presentation skills while delivering the message? Consider use of images or other visual aids, vocal qualities, use of humor, body language, connection with the audience, and so forth.
Conclusion
Wrap up your reflections on the TED speaker’s presentation.
What is your overall judgment of the argument’s quality and effectiveness based on your answers to the questions above?

Literary analysis

Paper details choose a topic from list and write a proper literary analysis style paper with in text citation and quotes from the play “Othello”
topics to choose from:
•Discuss the role that race plays in Shakespeare’s portrayal of Othello. How do the other characters react to Othello’s skin color or to the fact that he is a Moor? How does Othello see himself?
•Discuss the theme “dishonesty” in the play “Othello.”
•How does marriage work as a theme in this play?
•How does Othello’s pride lead to his fall?
•To what extent do perceptions of Othello as an outsider contribute to his downfall?
•Why did Emilia give Iago Othello’s handkerchief knowing his evil ways and being a devoted friend to Desdemona
•Analyze the idea of jealousy and love in the play “Othello”’
•How are women portrayed in “Othello”?
•To what extent are males dominant in “Othello”
• Choose one of the major characters from the play and analyze what makes that character tick? What are his/her qualities? What flaws does this figure possess?

There need to be a total of 4 sources; one of those is the play itself. The other 3 will help support your ideas in the paper.

Make sure to use in text citations and use all sources in the paper
Title is interesting and fully grabs the reader’s attention
Introduction is engaging
Each body paragraph’s topic sentence sets a clear path in developing the thesis
Evidence from the play is relevant; the quote selection is insightful and supports the analysis
Evidence from the secondary sources is relevant; the quote selection is insightful and supports the analysis
Analysis shows depth of thought and presents unique, interesting insight
Conclusion smoothly wraps up the paper and contains insightful reflection on the impact and relevance of the theme for the reader
Direct quotes and paraphrased details are integrated smoothly
Maintains a clear, cohesive, and logical structure and guides the reader with smooth transitions
MLA citations are correctly formatted and embedded after direct quotes/paraphrased details
Works Cited page is correctly formatted and documents each source referenced in the paper
A lively, interesting writer’s voice comes through to the audience

Essay Writing at Proficient Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: